![]() ![]() A delivering file can get to its destination through P2P application, but in the same time, the communication/delivery of other networking applications will be blocked. ![]() Nevertheless P2P computing still retains significant advantages in file transmission. As a result, such P2P applications are banned on enterprise networks, where connections are ex-pensive resources. P2P applications flood the backbone network with packets, thus leading to congestion. This limits the ability of the host to deliver any other data. Through P2P meth-ods, most of the connections available to a file host are occupied through pull-based methods by file retrievers. However, P2P implementations employ greedy delivering strategies that can easily congest backbone network, but all kinds of data must be delivered on the backbone network. ![]() P2P methods can deliver large files by dividing them into small chunks. Peer-to-peer (P2P) application could be viewed as fast pull-based file-sharing system. Therefore, we suggest organizations use EP2P for the delivery of content. Using EP2P, the outbound traffic from a sender on an Intranet canīe controlled efficiently, because the transmission between a provider and many receivers can be changed from passive to active (EP2P), which integrates passive and active approaches. This study presents a novel application called Enterprise Peer-to-Peer Related studies demonstrated that the active method for content can minimize outboundĬongestion for a provider but it needs the fault tolerance. Therefore, existing P2P approaches are infeasible for large-scale organizations as a congested uncontrolled network Methods incur network congestion due to the large number of uncontrolled connections established by those retrieving content.Īdditionally, P2P methods potentially stop file providers from exchanging data with other devices because of congested outbound The Peer-to-Peer (P2P) approaches utilize the passive means of delivering large amounts of content due to the ease of contentĭelivery and small amount of effort required for file transmission and failure control by the file provider. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |